Abstract Experssionism was never an ideal label for the movement which grew up in New York in the 1940s and 1950s. It was somehow meant to encompass not only the work of painters who filled their canvases with fields of colour and abstract forms, but also those who attacked their canvases with a vigorous term for a group of artists who did hold much in common. All were committed to an expressive art of profound emotion and universal themes , and most were shaped by the legacy of "Surrealism", a movement which they translated into a new style fitted to the post-war mood of anxiety and trauma. In their success, the New York painters robbed Paris of its mantle as leader of modern art, and set the stage for America's post-war dominance of the international art world.
Monday, 9 February 2015
Abstract Experssionism was never an ideal label for the movement which grew up in New York in the 1940s and 1950s. It was somehow meant to encompass not only the work of painters who filled their canvases with fields of colour and abstract forms, but also those who attacked their canvases with a vigorous term for a group of artists who did hold much in common. All were committed to an expressive art of profound emotion and universal themes , and most were shaped by the legacy of "Surrealism", a movement which they translated into a new style fitted to the post-war mood of anxiety and trauma. In their success, the New York painters robbed Paris of its mantle as leader of modern art, and set the stage for America's post-war dominance of the international art world.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment